Is Your Insured’s Website Compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act?

In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law to give disabled people the same access to American life as those without disabilities.  The Act is intended to give equal access to all Americans to all public spaces.  The law was initially thought of as only applying to brick and mortar locations and couldn’t address access to the Internet, since the Internet wasn’t fully commercialized until 1995.  However, in response to a landmark case in Florida (Gil v. Winn Dixie), the court declared that Title III requirements of the law apply if the website is ‘heavily integrated’ with and serves as a ‘gateway’ to physical stores/services. The verdict was entered on June 12, 2017.  As a result, companies are now finding themselves targets for ADA claims based on the inaccessibility of their websites and media by those who are disabled.  

Consider this example: A blind or visually impaired person is currently able to navigate some websites using a ‘screen reader’ which will convert the content to a useable format.  Their access could be audio or braille.  However, not all websites have this functionality that would give them equal access to online information. 

Another problem with some websites is the inability for keyboard navigation as an alternative to mouse navigation, which can be problematic for people with physical disabilities.  This can be mitigated by adapting websites to allow for keyboard navigation.

However, in both of these examples, the challenge is that the website must be set up with software that enables the disabled person to navigate the site.  Many, if not most, websites are not set up to handle this need.  An additional challenge for ADA and website compliance is that the regulations that determine the level of ADA compliance have not yet been finalized by Congress. 

The opening for ADA claims arising from website accessibility comes from several sources: job application procedures, hiring, firing, career advancement, job training, and use of online content.  The question now becomes, “Is this an insurable risk, and if so, where can I find insurance coverage?”

Initially, since it relates to access, an insured might think this is covered by their General Liability policy.  This is incorrect, as the personal/advertising liability does not extend to online access.
Since the claim appears to derive from the media the insured has put online, an insured might understandably think that the Media or Website Liability policy would be the answer.  However, the Media Policy may deny coverage for this type of claim. This denial will most likely be based on the fact that the medium itself is not the issue; rather, it is the functionality or performance of the website.  Media policies are generally designed to cover allegations of libel, slander, defamation, and copyright infringement.

Someone may look at a Professional Liability policy since this could be construed as a failure to provide a service.  That could be a challenge because the service is being provided, but not everyone can see it.  The claim may only address access and not the failure of a service, so that is not the ideal fix.  Also, there may not be a professional service being provided to the point where the client can buy an E&O policy.  

Another option could be Cyberliability coverage.  Some carriers have accepted ADA website claims on the basis that the claim can trigger their Privacy and Security Wrongful Act definition of “violations of laws that govern accessibility.” In some ways, this is similar to how some cyber markets will pick up Social Engineering, seeking to differentiate their products in a crowded marketplace.  However, due to the lack of a breach or loss of PII/PHI, it may be a stretch for Cyber coverage to respond.  

One insurance policy that can potentially provide some defense coverage would be Employment Practices Liability.  If an insured has Third-party Coverage, including Third-party Discrimination Coverage, it might be able trigger the EPL policy.  If an insured is providing something to the population at large, with the exception of the disabled, that could be alleged to be discriminatory towards the disabled.  The EPL policies do not cover the expenses to modify property to make it ADA compliant, but they do cover defense costs.  A similar approach would be expected if an EPL policy were to respond to these claims.

Even under the best of circumstances, the insured needs to consider the cost of upgrading their site to be ADA compliant.  Fixing the problem is always preferred over waiting for a claim to hit.  

Website compliance under the ADA will continue to evolve, especially considering the fact that official regulations have not come out yet. This issue only underscores the need for constant vigilance and understanding of a complex issue in the marketplace.

This article was authored by Charles Sharp, member of AmWINS National Professional Lines Practice.
Contact Us

To learn more about how AmWINS can help you place coverage for your clients, reach out to your local AmWINS broker.  If you do not have a contact at AmWINS, please click here.

Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.

(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.

Most Popular Insights

Four Key Additional Insured Endorsements for Contractors


Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.

Claims Reporting: Better Late than Never?

A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.

Understanding Property Theories of Recovery and Ensuing Loss Clauses

​The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.

Insurance Commissioner Orders Carriers to Pay for Mudslide Damages

The Thomas Fire, the largest fire in California's history, subsequently led to a mudslide on January 9, 2018, which caused a massive amount of damage in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The California Insurance Commissioner has issued a formal notice reminding carriers to pay for damage, citing the "efficient proximate cause doctrine." This article takes a closer look at the doctrine and how it has been challenged in court over the years.

Ordinance or Law Insurance Coverage

Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.

Employment Practices Liability in the Age of #MeToo

In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.

Sign Up For Our Monthly Newsletter

Sign Up