The legal cannabis industry has experienced rapid growth over the last few years and has had a significant impact on the United States economy. In 2018, the cannabis industry reached over $10.4 billion in sales and is projected to reach $22 billion by 2022. The number of jobs directly related to the industry reached 211,000 in 2018, and with over 64,000 new jobs added, it is one of the fastest growing job markets in the country.1 Cannabis is currently legal for medicinal use in 33 states (and D.C.) and for recreational use in 11 states (and D.C.)2 With the cannabis market booming and states continuing to legalize its use, insurance needs for these businesses are becoming a significant topic of discussion.
Despite being legal in many states, cannabis is considered a Schedule 1 substance by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration. Insurance carriers have been slow to enter the cannabis sector due to the drug’s illegal status federally and the very limited data on health impacts, loss trends and milestone claims needed by underwriters to accurately understand and price the risks. A.M. Best reported that insurers who have entered the cannabis space remain cautious, only offering basic policies with limits that may be inadequate for larger marijuana business owners.
Cannabis businesses are also unable to find coverage through the London market, as Lloyd’s prohibits writing cannabis risks in the United States due to federal banking regulations. However, since Canada passed national legislation in October 2018 making all cannabis and hemp products legal, many Lloyd’s syndicates and underwriters are actively writing various coverage lines on Canadian cannabis accounts.
This article will examine five of the most significant issues impacting insurance coverage for the cannabis industry in today’s market.
Since cannabis is illegal at the federal level under the Controlled Substances Act, financial institutions are subject to criminal prosecution for their involvement with cannabis-related businesses. For some states that have legalized cannabis, there are community banks and credit unions that are willing to provide banking services. However, to protect themselves from legal repercussions, many financial institutions remain hesitant or unwilling to work with cannabis-related accounts. This has forced numerous cannabis-related businesses to operate on a cash-only basis, making it difficult for those companies to engage in standard business practices such as paying employees and taxes.
The Bank Secrecy Act, Money Laundering Statute and Unlicensed Money Transmitter Statute are the three primary federal criminal laws that can be triggered when institutions engage in transactions involving cannabis or proceeds from the sales. Violations to these laws can result in serious fines (up to $500,000) and jail time.
A potential resolution may be on the horizon. In March 2019, the House Financial Services Committee voted in favor of advancing H.R. 1595, the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. The proposed legislation would provide the following benefits:
Prevent federal banking regulators from punishing banks that work with cannabis-related businesses
Protect ancillary businesses that work with the cannabis industry from being charged with money laundering and other financial crimes
Require the Financial Institution Examination Council to develop guidance to help credit unions and banks understand how to lawfully serve cannabis businesses3
Update: On September 25, 2019, the House of Representatives passed the SAFE Banking Act by a vote of 321 to 103.4 Before becoming law, the legislation still needs to be voted on by the Senate and signed by the President.
Since many cannabis-related businesses, such as dispensaries, operate using paper currency, crime is a significant part of their risk exposure. These businesses also house a large amount of product that can be stolen and sold on the black market for a substantial amount of money. This high potential for crime puts employees and patrons at risk for injury if a robbery should occur.
Despite the substantial risk of crime, many carriers will exclude Assault & Battery or sublimit the coverage. As a result, a business’ location and its security features are important factors to be aware of when looking to place coverage.
While the crime score of a location can impact its ability to secure coverage, even retailers with insureds in safer areas should still review the policy to ensure Assault & Battery is not excluded.
Insurers will often review the due diligence measures and sophistication of security programs employed by a business to prevent crime. For retail dispensary shops, this can include ID checks, personal shoppers that monitor a patron’s activity, a limit to the number of customers allowed in each room at a time, and surveillance cameras. For cultivation facilities and processors, third-parties are typically brought in to handle security. Their services can include armed security with automatic rifles, trained dogs, and armed car service for transportation of product. Businesses with robust risk management programs can see a reduction in rates and more coverage options.
With passage of the Farm Bill in 2018, the United States Congress has legalized the cultivation of hemp and, if produced in a manner consistent with the law, removed restrictions on the sale, transport, and possession of hemp products. Under this bill, hemp is defined as the cannabis plant with one important difference: hemp cannot contain more than 0.3 percent of THC, the chemical responsible for most of cannabis’ mind-altering effects. Cannabinoids (or CBD) are a set of chemical compounds found in the cannabis plant. Under the Farm Bill, any CBD product derived from hemp is considered legal if produced in a manner consistent with the legislation.5
Since hemp and CBD are now legal, their coverage must be separated out from other cannabis risks. With its legalization still relatively new, hemp and CBD insurance placements remain solely in the E&S market. There are insurance products available on the casualty side, but it may take some time before these risks are available in the standard market or in a farm liability package.
Cannabis risks and exposures have expanded beyond traditional smoking. Vape pens and e-cigarettes are becoming users’ preferred method of consumption due to their convenience and reduced smoke inhalation. Businesses throughout the cannabis supply chain, including cultivators, processors, distributors, and retailers, face exposure from vape products in the event that a defect results in injury or a label fails to include proper warnings. For example, processors that put cannabis into oil form, which is then placed in the vape pen’s capsule, could be pulled into litigation if a claim occurs.
There have been several losses resulting from fatalities due to exploding batteries in vape pens. Most of the incidents can be traced back to five Chinese battery manufacturers. Any vape pen that utilizes these manufacturers will be excluded from coverage by nearly all carriers, making it pertinent to know where all parts are coming from in order to avoid these facilities.
Due to these risks, very few insurance carriers are willing to cover vape products, and those that do offer coverage charge a separate rate for vape and accessory exposure. The difficult nature of securing this coverage has caused many businesses to modify their offering or self-insure.
Throughout the summer of 2019, there have been nearly 200 cases of vaping-related respiratory illnesses reported by doctors and hospitals in 22 states, with one incident claiming the life of a patient in Illinois. While the exact causes of the illnesses are unknown, many of the patients acknowledged vaping cannabis’ high-inducing chemical, THC.6 This development may further complicate insuring vape products in the future.
From seed to sale, businesses throughout the cannabis supply chain have specific risks and coverage needs. Below are the top risks, coverages and gaps to look out for when handling cannabis-related accounts.
Two important coverages for cultivators are Goods in Process (coverage for damage to growing crops) and Finished Stock, (coverage for crops still in the insured’s possession that have been harvested, budded, and cultivated and are ready to move to the next phase of production.) While many carriers will exclude these coverages, both can be found if desired. It is important for agents to note that these coverages will be sub-limited.
Outdoor Crop Coverage, typically an exposure for hemp crops, has proven to be the most difficult coverage to place within the cannabis and hemp/CBD space. Carriers offering this coverage are scarce and those willing to offer coverage charge a much higher rate.
To accurately determine the limits needed, valuation of the outdoor crop is an important step that requires a detailed understanding of the crops being grown, including the yield per acre, total number of acres, and the growth phase used to calculate value.
Extractors often combine many sources of raw products, which creates the risk for cross-contamination and Products Liability exposure. One bad ingredient, whose source may not be identifiable, could ruin an entire batch of product, causing a loss in product value and production time, bodily injury, recall and/or reputational damage.
Carriers are beginning to amend the Health Hazard Exclusion to allow for Sudden and Accidental coverage, which is a carve back for bodily injury claims that occur at single point in time.
In response to the growing market, testing labs are now actively seeking Professional Liability protection. This is not only pursued in compliance with the Farm Bill’s 0.3 percent THC limit for hemp and CBD products, but also in legalized states where cannabis itself is evaluated for potency and quality, among other criteria.
For cannabis risks, there are no master multi-state policies. Separate policies are required for each state.
When cannabis products are in transport, many businesses do not have proper risk management controls in place. If companies are transporting a significant amount of product, an armed car service should be considered, as well as coverage for stock in transit.
While dispensaries often employ pharmacists and physicians for licensing purposes, a common gap in Medical Professional Liability exposure exists when these roles are limited solely to medical director or healthcare consultant services. Currently, the two primary areas for which dispensaries obtain Professional Liability coverage are: (1) licensed pharmacists dispensing the cannabis products for said dispensaries and, (2) licensed medical directors providing referral cards.While the market is extremely limited in this sector, Professional Liability continues to evolve as enterprising carriers begin to consider emerging risks.
An emerging coverage solution, known as Budtenders E&O, provides protection to clerks at the cannabis dispensary who provide consumers with advice or recommendations on specific products. As Budtenders E&O was designed to fill the potential gaps within Product Liability policies, this is primarily added as an endorsement within GL, despite the increasing demand for a stand-alone policy.
As discussed in the Crime section of this article, Assault and Battery is a significant exposure at cannabis-related businesses. However, carriers often exclude this coverage from policies.
As with any business, General Liability coverage and the potential for Slip & Fall claims should not be overlooked when protecting the company’s premises and operations. However, standard General Liability policies exclude Schedule 1 substances from coverage, which make it difficult to obtain adequate coverage.
The cannabis industry is evolving daily as a result of emerging concerns and new ways to look at coverage forms. With cannabis-related health research just beginning to be conducted and loss data and claims examples still in their infancy, coverage in the cannabis space remains almost exclusively in the E&S marketplace. While there are program solutions available for cannabis-related businesses in the market today, most have insufficient coverage and gaps that leave the insured exposed. Many carriers that have entered the space choose to work with distribution partners that have a strong understanding of the cannabis industry and needs of the related businesses.7
AmWINS has specialist brokers across the United States and in London who are well-versed in the current issues in the cannabis and hemp/CBD space. This expertise allows us to guide our retail clients through the placement process and help them understand all lines of coverage needed to build a comprehensive risk management and insurance program for their insureds.
The following AmWINS specialists contributed to this article.
TJ Collins – Vice President, Casualty, AmWINS Brokerage in Kansas City, MO
Matt Jarrett – Director, Casualty, THB London
Ryan Schaller – Associate Broker, Property, AmWINS Brokerage in San Francisco, CA
Charlie Grodecki – Vice President, Professional Lines, AmWINS Brokerage in Charlotte, NC
Jeff Katz – Vice President, Property, AmWINS Brokerage in Kansas City, MO
1 CNBC (March 2019). The marijuana industry looks like the fastest-growing job market in the country. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/14/the-marijuana-industry-looks-like-the-fastest-growing-job-market-in-the-country.html
2 USA Today (June 2019). Illinois approves legal weed, expunging criminal records for pot crimes. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/25/legal-weed-illinois-approves-recreational-marijuana-criminal-reform/1552697001/
3 Congress.gov. H.R.1595 - SAFE Banking Act of 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1595/text
4 CNN (September 2019). House passes cannabis banking bill, but it faces uncertainty in Senate. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/cannabis-banking-bill-house-vote/index.html
5 Brookings (December 2018). The Farm Bill, hemp legalization and the status of CBD: An explainer. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2018/12/14/the-farm-bill-hemp-and-cbd-explainer/
6 The New York Times (August 2019). First Death in a Spate of Vaping Sicknesses Reported by Health Officials. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/23/health/vaping-death-cdc.html
7 Insurance Journal (March 2019). Insurers Remain Cautious About Marijuana Insurance Market. https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/03/14/520607.htm
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
Over the last few years, the legal cannabis industry has seen rapid growth and had a significant impact on the U.S. economy. With states continuing to legalize its use, insurance needs for cannabis-related businesses are becoming a popular topic of discussion. This article examines the evolving cannabis industry by exploring five key issues impacting coverage.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.
Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.
In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.