Four Reasons Why Reference Based Pricing Could Become the Norm for Self-Insured Employer Groups

As self-insured employer groups wrestle with the requirements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), some are tapping the potential of reference based pricing (RBP) to control costs. Expect this trend to become more common among larger self insureds, especially as proof grows about RBP’s powerful cost control effect on plans. Here’s why:

1. A Proven Cost-saver

One of the nation’s largest self-insured employer groups has already demonstrated RBP can deliver impressive cost savings for certain medical procedures with a wide price variance. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), which serves 1.4 million people, adopted RBP more than three years ago for elective knee and hip replacements. It made this change after reviewing prices medical providers charged for the two common procedures. Previously, these costs ranged from $20,000 to $120,000, and CalPERS did not find that quality increased with prices.¹

CalPERS examined these costs and established a $30,000 reference price it would pay for the two procedures. The organization designated 41 hospitals where members could undergo these two procedures throughout California. The RBP plan included a 10 percent copayment charged to employees on procedures costing less than $30,000.

Members could also go out of network and choose a procedure priced higher than $30,000. However, they would not only have to make the 10 percent copayment, but pay every dollar over the established $30,000 RBP limit.

How did CalPERS do? First, the hospitals that the organization chose were rated average or above average for quality measures. This accomplished a major requirement that makes RBP acceptable under the ACA by ensuring quality to members. Financially, RBP delivered as advertised. CalPERS saved almost $6 million in just the first two years of this approach.¹

2. RBP Does Not Run Afoul of Government Regulations and Guidelines

Even the Department of Labor (DOL) has recognized the potential impact of RBP. The government agency stated in October that RBP was compliant with the ACA as long as the insurer offered reasonable access to providers and ensured a level of quality. Additionally, the DOL indicated that insurers were not required to count charges in excess of an established reference based price as part of an insured’s out-of-pocket costs.

3. Traditional Insurers Have Been Early RBP Adopters

For more proof that RBP is not going away, you need look no further than a growing number of large traditional health insurance companies that have also adopted this practice. Earlier this year, WellPoint said it would offer set prices for 900 medical services, and it is not the only large insurer to go in this direction.

4. RBP Can Help Employers Avoid an ACA Excise Tax

In 2018, the Internal Revenue Service will begin collecting a 40 percent excise tax on so-called Cadillac health plans – those plans exceeding $10,200 for individual coverage and $27,500 for family coverage. The American Health Policy Institute found that large employers triggering this tax would pay an excise tax equal to $1 million in 2018 and $2,700 per employee from 2018 to 2024.

Not-so incidentally, exceeding the cap on health plan benefits will also affect employees. ACA states that excess benefits are considered income, and employees will have to pay income tax on any amounts over the cap.

One Continuing Obstacle is Balance Billing

The argument for RBP, especially with a growing acceptance of the practice by self-insured and traditional employer groups, is offset by the lingering reality of balance billing. Large plans typically expect participating medical providers to charge insureds no more than negotiated prices. RBP pricing may not be overly generous, especially compared to past prices, but they technically are fair. RBP typically reimburses costs equal to Medicare rates plus an additional 25 to 35 percent. Most people in the industry agree this is a fair rate for common medical services in today’s cost control environment.

However, some medical providers will attempt to game the system, collecting established RBP rates from the insurer and also charging an additional dollar amount or percentage of costs to the insured. This practice can drive human resources professionals batty, and dump a financial and emotional burden on employees. It is a practice that prevents some self-insured employer groups from adopting RBP.

How can self-insured employer groups achieve the promise of RBP and avoid the practice of balance billing on its employees? The same way traditional insurers do, with strong contractual guarantees explicitly disallowing balance billing. Working with experienced third party administrators, a self-insured group can ensure balance billing language is airtight.

The Future is Near

Reference based pricing isn’t new, nor is it unproven. The need to control still-growing health insurance costs will make more large employers sit up and take notice of the practice. If no changes are made to the ACA’s 2018 excise tax provision, this event will jolt some self-insured groups into taking a serious look at RBP.

Today, we serve clients that use RBP, and we know how well it can work. A growing number of companies and vendors are providing this cost control tool to self-insured employer groups. In a few years, it’s likely that more large employers will take this approach than ones who will not. It makes sense and controls costs. Its time has come.

¹ Reference Pricing: Stimulating Cost-Conscious Purchasing and Countering Provider Market Power, by James C. Robinson, Ph.D., Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor of Health Economics & Director, Berkeley Center for Health Technology, University of California, Berkeley; October 2013, National Institute for Health Care Management, http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/Reference-Pricing-EV-Robinson-10-29-13.pdf

Contact Us

To learn more about how AmWINS can help you place coverage for your clients, reach out to your local AmWINS broker. If you do not have a contact at AmWINS, please click here.

Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.

Most Popular Insights

Casualty, Construction, Property & Casualty

Four Key Additional Insured Endorsements for Contractors

11/13/18

Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.

Casualty, Professional Lines, Property, Property & Casualty

Claims Reporting: Better Late than Never?

08/16/18

A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.

Property, Property & Casualty

Understanding Property Theories of Recovery and Ensuing Loss Clauses

08/16/18

The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.

Property, Property & Casualty, Small Business

Insurance Commissioner Orders Carriers to Pay for Mudslide Damages

The Thomas Fire, the largest fire in California's history, subsequently led to a mudslide on January 9, 2018, which caused a massive amount of damage in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The California Insurance Commissioner has issued a formal notice reminding carriers to pay for damage, citing the "efficient proximate cause doctrine." This article takes a closer look at the doctrine and how it has been challenged in court over the years.

Construction, Property, Property & Casualty

Ordinance or Law Insurance Coverage

Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.

Professional Lines, Property & Casualty

Employment Practices Liability in the Age of #MeToo

In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.

Sign Up For Our Monthly Newsletter

Sign Up